Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with an 87.5 score against 72.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 has newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy A71 is a lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, even when both of them were released only a couple months apart.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 has just a little better battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a back facing camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the same sensor size and the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy A71 is a bit more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.