Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 92.9 score against 72.6. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide very similar operating system features. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, although they were only released 1 months apart.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a just a little greater display density. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7% larger battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.