Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 2 years before. The Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a bit more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A8 (2018) has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 40 percent more battery size. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.