Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 85.2 score against 72.6. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is an older device than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter anyway. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit greater pixel quantity per screen inch and a little bit bigger screen.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 11% more battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, better video frame rates and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.