Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Alpha is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a 76.3 score against 72.6. Galaxy Alpha's construction is lighter and incredibly thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Alpha has a newer 4.4.4 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features and a performance increase.
Galaxy Alpha features a little more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it has a just a bit lower pixels count per inch in the display, a much smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little better performance than Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
Realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, faster video frame rate and a camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Alpha is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.