Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy F62 is an a bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the same diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same sensor size, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rate.
Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.