Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 97.6 score against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is a lot thinner but notably heavier than realme X3 SuperZoom, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density. The Galaxy Fold's processor is very similar to the processor in realme X3 SuperZoom, and although the Galaxy Fold has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Fold has much more storage to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.