Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy J8 has a score of 76.7, which is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy J8 is older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better display than Galaxy J8, because it has a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy J8 features just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy J8, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy J8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.