Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is slightly better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a a little lighter phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both of them are equally thin. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide all the same OS features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit worse pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display. Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a lot better video quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy M20 has improved battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.