Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. The Galaxy M30 body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released about a year before.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little higher screen pixel density. The Galaxy M30 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with improved battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 19 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.