Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 has an overall score of 85, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS. The Samsung Galaxy M40 design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released only 12 months before.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better screen than Galaxy M40, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy M40 has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M40 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a superior camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has greater battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.