Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a global score of 87.7 against 72.6. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Galaxy M51's construction is a little heavier and a bit thicker than realme X3 SuperZoom. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same aperture, a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 has a much better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.