Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 81.2 score against 72.6. The Galaxy Note 3 is an extremely older cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's a little thinner and lighter anyway. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it has a quite lower pixels quantity per inch of display, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller screen. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality, faster 60 fps video frame rates, a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Realme X3 SuperZoom has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy Note 3 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.