Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 79.3 score against 72.6. The Galaxy Note 5 is an much older cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 7 more cores.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 40% larger battery capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a greater camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video, a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, better video frame rates and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note 5 is a little more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.