Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a global score of 80.4 against 72.6. Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is notably older than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a way larger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 31 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.