Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a score of 89 against 72.6. Galaxy Note10 is an older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite bigger display.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note10. Both of them have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has much more storage to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has more internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has superior battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.