Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. Galaxy Note3's body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 7 years before. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little greater display density, a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger camera aperture, a lot bigger back camera sensor, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.