Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. The Galaxy Note5 is an incredibly older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen density. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a way better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger aperture to take better images in low light environments, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 40 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.