Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. Galaxy Note7 is an much older cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Samsung managed to make it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
Galaxy Note7 features a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures, better video frame rates and a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit more memory to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.