Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy On7 Prime has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. The Galaxy On7 Prime body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released many years before. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy On7 Prime has the newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a quite better processing power than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The realme X3 SuperZoom captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy On7 Prime has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 27% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.