Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10 is older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's design is notably lighter and thinner. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 has 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S10 features a little bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S10. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 24 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.