Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a score of 93.6 against 72.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a better pixel count per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little better battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back camera with lot more MP and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the realme X3 SuperZoom, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.