Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 89.7 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's body is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, even when both of them were released only 4 months apart. The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S10 Lite. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a bit better display pixel density. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much bigger storage for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.