Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 86.3 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design is thinner and way lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released just 15 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit sharper screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S10e features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e is a little more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.