Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 94.8 score against 72.6. Although the Galaxy S20 and the realme X3 SuperZoom were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy S20 is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20's CPU is very similar to the realme X3 SuperZoom one, and although the Galaxy S20 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 is a lot more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.