Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a score of 98 against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a little bit heavier phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both have the same thickness. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a CPU that is just as good as the processing unit in realme X3 SuperZoom, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better camera than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a way better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.