Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a overall score of 89.1 against 72.6. The Galaxy S21 FE is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S21 FE has newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features.
The realme X3 SuperZoom and the Galaxy S21 FE count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy S21 FE has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit superior processor than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S21 FE has as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both have exactly the same internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features a bit longer battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.