Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a global score of 93.4 against 72.6. Galaxy S22's body is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy S22 has a sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. Galaxy S22 has as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S22, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and better video frame rates.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.