Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design has the same thickness than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bit bigger display and a better pixel density.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features as much memory to store more apps and games as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, they have equal internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures just a bit better pictures and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.