Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.13 ounces | -- |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 82.6 score against 72.6. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Galaxy S25 is a lighter and way thinner cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy S25 and realme X3 SuperZoom both feature really similar storage for games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom and Galaxy S25 count with very similar cameras, because although the Galaxy S25 has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S25 is way more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.