Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.13 ounces | -- |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a better pixel density, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with longer battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a lot better video definition, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.