Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Plus is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a score of 78.1 against 72.6. Galaxy S5 Plus is an way older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Samsung could make it a lot lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S5 Plus has newer 4.4.2 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, giving some extra features.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little faster processor than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has a better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and better video frame rate.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.