Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Blue and Red |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Galaxy S5 Sport is a extremely lighter phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both are 0.35inches thick.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a lot better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way more mega-pixels camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and faster video frame rate.
The Galaxy S5 Sport not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.