Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | -- |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with an 80.9 score against 72.6. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. Galaxy S6 Active features a much more vibrant screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S6 Active has a bit better processing unit than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 5 GB less RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processor.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.