Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Galaxy S7 is an older cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Samsung was able to build it noticeably lighter and thinner. Galaxy S7 features a brighter screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster).
Realme X3 SuperZoom takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and better video frame rates.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.