Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a global score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a way older and thicker cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Samsung was able to make it a little lighter anyway. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the display. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S7 Active is also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.