Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a general score of 81.7 against 72.6. The Galaxy S8 body is a lot lighter and thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Samsung Galaxy S8 has just a bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM. Galaxy S8 features a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with higher video frame rates, a way bigger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 40% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy S8 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.