Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a score of 81.9 against 72.6. Although it's the best we are comparing, the Galaxy S8 Active design is extremely older, thicker and a little heavier than realme X3 SuperZoom. The Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with faster video frame rate, a way larger sensor shooting much better quality photos and a much better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S8 Active not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.