Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a score of 83.3 against 72.6. Galaxy S9 is an much older cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit superior processor than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S9 has just a bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a greater screen pixel density. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S9 has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 400 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 40% greater battery size.
The Galaxy S9 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.