Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 80.1 score against 72.6. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a noticeably thicker and much heavier cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a camera with a much higher resolution and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater storage to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as realme X3 SuperZoom. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the realme X3 SuperZoom, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.