Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing here, Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than realme X3 SuperZoom.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images and video in low light situations, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.