Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. The Galaxy Z Flip design is a little lighter and thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, even when both were only released 4 months apart. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater memory to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip and realme X3 SuperZoom count with really similar processing units, both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The realme X3 SuperZoom shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot larger back camera sensor and a lot better 64 MP resolution back camera.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 27 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the realme X3 SuperZoom. If you want to save some money, you can buy realme X3 SuperZoom, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.