Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 85.6 score against 72.6. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer phone, and it is also much thinner and just a little bit lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a little bit greater screen density, a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit larger display. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both have the same internal storage.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.