Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though they were only released 2 months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing lots of additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than realme X3 SuperZoom. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a little bit larger display, a quite better pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
The realme X3 SuperZoom captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way bigger sensor and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.