Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 90.6 score against 72.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is newer and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom's, although it's also incredibly heavier.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 and realme X3 SuperZoom both count with similar processing units, and although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.