Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 II has an overall score of 87.2, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. The Xperia 5 II construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though both of them were released with only 4 months difference. The Sony Xperia 5 II features a bit better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a little higher pixel count per inch of screen.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit more powerful processor than Sony Xperia 5 II. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a superior camera than Xperia 5 II, because although it has slower 60 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a camera with much more MP.
The Xperia 5 II has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Xperia 5 II also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better battery performance than Sony Xperia 5 II, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
The Xperia 5 II is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.