Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 96.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-12-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Frosted Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO-I is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a overall score of 96.3 against 72.6. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Xperia PRO-I has newer 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, giving you a couple additional features and enhanced performance. The Xperia PRO-I design has the same thickness than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's a bit heavier.
The Xperia PRO-I has a better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel density and a lot better 1644 x 3840 resolution. Sony Xperia PRO-I has a very superior memory for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 384 GB more internal memory.
The Xperia PRO-I counts with a processor that's just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's processing unit, and although the Xperia PRO-I has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xperia PRO-I has just a bit longer battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better photos and videos than Xperia PRO-I, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.