Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a score of 82.2 against 72.6. Xperia XZ2 Premium's construction is older, much thicker and heavier than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much sharper screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840px and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 400 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with improved battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.