Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZs has a score of 77.2, which is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. The Sony Xperia XZs design is lighter and a bit thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 3 years before. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit superior processing unit than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better looking screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little bit lower pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display. The Sony Xperia XZs captures slightly better videos and photos than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot lower image and video quality, a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a smaller camera aperture and a camera with much less mega pixels.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy realme X3 SuperZoom, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.