Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a general score of 78.8 against 72.6. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Xperia Z4v body is noticeably lighter and just a little bit thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better processor than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, and they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. Xperia Z4v has a more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot better camera than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a way better battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
The Xperia Z4v not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.